Sound familiar?
- The builders say “that's how it's supposed to be” — and you have no way to tell.
- One tradesman says redo it, another says it's fine.
- You need one stage checked now, not the whole project supervised.
- You asked a friend “who knows about this” — and got one more opinion.
“Construction is full of experts who say ‘this was done wrong’ but never explain why. In the end it all comes down to one person — their opinion, their mood, their subjective judgement.”
How it works
- You send a request
Choose which stage of work to check and give the address. Four questions in Telegram.
- An operator comes and films the site
Filming follows a fixed protocol — walls, floors, ceilings, corners, joints, utility inlets. You don't need to explain anything.
- The expert reviews the footage and writes the report
In one to two days: what was done right, what to improve, what to fix — and the key answer: can this stage be accepted or not.
- You show it to the builders
The conversation is about specific places and standards, not someone's opinion. That's hard to argue with.
What we inspect
The apartment before you sign the acceptance certificate.
Wiring, plumbing, waterproofing, screed, plaster, underfloor heating, tiling, partitions.
Foundation, roof, building services.
Who answers for the result
in construction
An operator with a filming kit comes to the site; their job is to record the stage of work to a protocol, in full and with nothing skipped. The review and the verdict on that footage are made by an engineer with a degree in engineering and the status of a forensic expert in construction. This is not a tradesman's opinion but an assessment against building standards — by the same specialist whose reports are accepted in court.
“AI is a tool. The engineer is the one who answers for the result.”
Behind that: over 20 years of designing and installing building services — heating, water supply, underfloor heating, boiler rooms, electrical work. Someone who has built these systems sees on site what a photograph never shows. You can watch him take buildings apart on his YouTube channel; the report is issued by the expert organisation OOO Mosenergoservis.
One more thing we consider important: we don't label everything “critical”. One crack is not another — size, location and the stage of work all matter. The report gives you an assessment, not a label: is this within the standard or not, and what to do about it.
If it turns into a dispute
Usually the inspection report is enough — enough to show the builders and settle the matter. But if the dispute goes further, the same expert will prepare a full forensic report — a document accepted in court.
The full report is a separate service, 8,000–15,000 ₽ depending on scope. It is rarely needed.
Reviews
The service is just starting — the first reviews will appear here after the first visits.
Questions
Can't I just take photos and ask ChatGPT?
You can, and some people do. But you need to know what to photograph, how to ask and how to read the answer — and no one carries responsibility for the conclusion. Here the report is written by a forensic expert who answers for it personally.
What if the builders disagree?
Disputed points are discussed with references to building standards rather than opinions — that is hard to argue with, and it usually ends the conversation faster than a week of messages. And if it goes further, the same report can be prepared for court.
Is the report an official document?
After the inspection you get a specialist's report — enough to present to the builders. If you need a document for court, the same expert will prepare a full forensic report: he is a forensic expert in construction.
Will you come if my own crew is doing the work, not a contractor?
Yes. It makes no difference who does the work — we look at the result.
What if everything turns out to be fine?
Then you will know it and accept the stage with peace of mind. That is a result people come for too.